I suppose if you value the senate at negative 100%, you can make a case that -49% is in fact greater than -59%. But I don't think that's what they mean. I think they're just clueless.
I suppose if you value the senate at negative 100%, you can make a case that -49% is in fact greater than -59%. But I don't think that's what they mean. I think they're just clueless.
No comments:
Post a Comment