I've been surprised that none of the astro-geo blogs I follow have posted this... The Big Picture has a terrific set of 35 Mars landscape images today. It's easy to think of Mars as a dead planet, and historically it has been been described as such. It is very likely (though not certainly) tectonically inactive- i.e. there is most likely no recent volcanism, and the crust is not mobile, as is that of Earth. Nevertheless, there are numerous processes that cause change to the planet's surface: wind, mass movement (for example, the landslide down the cliff face, above), sublimation of CO2 and H2O moving masses of those substances from pole to pole over Mars' year (about 2 Earth years), and the occasional meteorite impact. With few exceptions, the images depict change, however small, in relatively recent time- keep in mind, to a geologist, "relatively recent" may mean thousands to a few million years.
I think one thing that really struck me was how wonderfully abstract and "organic" some of the landscapes appear. And that these beautiful forms actually exist.
Of course some of the landscapes would look organic. Where do you think our Martian overlords come from?
ReplyDelete