This thought has led me to introduce what I hope is a helpful graphical device, which I call the Grid of Disputation. It’s just a reminder that, when it comes to other people’s views on controversial issues, they should be classified within a two-dimensional parameter space, not just on a single line of “agree/disagree.” The other dimension is the all-important “sensible/crazy” axis.I felt the the "crackpots" field needed to be renamed.
Miscellaneous thoughts on politics, people, math, science and other cool (if sometimes frustrating) stuff from somewhere near my favorite coffee shop.
Thursday, August 6, 2009
Disputes Sensible and Otherwise
Sean at Cosmic Variance, in the context of discussing a "debate" between young-earth creationist and scientists, introduced what he calls "The Grid of Disputation."
That graph works.
ReplyDeleteIsn't part of problem when it comes to "controversial" issues and science that the non-scientific/ crackpot community isn't really trying to engage the scientific community. If they did they would submit for publication like real scientists do when they want to present a theory.